High-Risk AI: Does Your System Qualify?
Annex III lists high-risk use cases, but the boundaries aren't obvious. How to assess whether your chatbot, recommendation engine, or hiring tool crosses the line.
Read more →Practical guidance on EU AI Act compliance for businesses with customer-facing AI systems.
Annex III lists high-risk use cases, but the boundaries aren't obvious. How to assess whether your chatbot, recommendation engine, or hiring tool crosses the line.
Read more →Deployer obligations under Article 26 are specific and technical. Human oversight, logging, data governance — what your engineering team actually needs to build.
Read more →Article 50 requires AI disclosure at first contact. Most businesses think a footer disclaimer is enough. It isn't.
Read more →Up to €35M or 7% of global turnover. How enforcement will likely work, based on GDPR precedent and the Act's own tiered penalty structure.
Read more →Article 27 requires deployers of high-risk AI to conduct an FRIA before going live. What that actually looks like in practice.
Read more →The Act applies to any organisation whose AI system affects people in the EU, regardless of where the company is based. Extraterritorial scope explained.
Read more →Social scoring, manipulative AI, real-time biometric surveillance — these prohibitions took effect in February 2025. Are you sure none of your systems qualify?
Read more →Providers of high-risk AI systems must supply deployers with detailed usage instructions. Most current documentation falls short of what the Act requires.
Read more →Article 72 requires ongoing surveillance of your AI system in production. Logging, drift detection, incident triggers — the compliance work doesn't stop at launch.
Read more →If your AI system causes harm, you have reporting obligations with tight timescales. What counts as a serious incident and who you need to notify.
Read more →